Preparing for trauma informed user research

What is meant by trauma informed practice, and why that could mean you prepare differently for trauma informed research. 

Trauma informed practice and how it applies to user research

Trauma informed practice in health and social care

References to trauma-informed principals and care were around in the 1980s and 1990s. However, in 2001 Maxine Harris and Roger Fallot's edited book (a book compiled from multiple authors expert on trauma and mental health), 'Using Trauma Theory to Design Service Systems', formalised trauma-informed care principals and helped establish trauma-informed approaches in healthcare and social services. Triggering widespread interest in trauma informed principals. Their contributions included:

  • Defining trauma theory and its application to mental health services
  • Explained the need for trauma-informed systems
  • Provided guidance on implementing trauma-informed care in service systems
  • Discussed future directions for trauma-informed practices.

 

How did trauma informed research start

In the mid-2010s practices for qualitative research started to incorporate trauma awareness when working with vulnerable users who have experienced trauma or have some protected characteristics. Researchers in public health, social work and psychology started to adopt trauma-informed methods to qualitative research. 

By late 2010s, trauma informed user research was starting to take shape, researchers across tech and government adopted trauma informed principles and an emergence of ethical guidelines for conducting research with vulnerable people started. Publications and talks on ethical research, consent and avoiding re-traumatisation starting to gain attention. 

Emphasised through the COVID-19 pandemic, there was widespread adoption by the early 2020s of trauma-informed design and research ethics. With large scale private organisations Microsoft, Google and large UK government departments DWP, incorporating trauma informed principals into user research frameworks. This also started the emergence of a wide range of industry publics such as 'Compassionate UX' and 'trauma-aware design'.

Publications have continued and iterated over time to focus on application across all User Centred Design professions, including the recent publication of 'Designed with Care', focused on creating trauma-informed content from a wide range of professions including the recent publication of 'Designed with Care' authored from 15 leading experts in content design.

 

Trauma informed user research principals

Trauma informed research principals vary dependent on organisation and their focus. These are my  'Trauma Informed User Research Principals' synthesised from a wide range of good practice, which focuses on the participants without bias of organisation. 

 

 

 

4. Minimizing Retraumatization

  • Be sensitive to past trauma and adjust the research approach to avoid triggering distress.
  • Use research methods that do not force participants to relive or detail distressing past experiences unless absolutely necessary.
  • Provide emotional support or signpost participants to support services if needed.

5. Inclusivity and Accessibility

  • Ensure research is inclusive and that it accommodates participants from diverse backgrounds, including those with disabilities, mental health challenges, or other vulnerabilities.
  • Follow accessibility guidelines (e.g., ensuring digital interfaces are easy to navigate and information is presented clearly for all users).

6. Ethical Responsibility and Aftercare

  • Take an ethical approach to all stages of the research, ensuring that participants’ rights are respected and that their well-being is prioritized.
  • Offer aftercare, providing resources or referrals to support services if the research process causes distress.
  • Maintain confidentiality and ensure participants’ privacy is respected.

7. Trauma-Aware Design

  • Design services that account for trauma: This includes creating user interfaces that avoid overwhelming or triggering users and ensuring that any required personal information is gathered respectfully and with empathy.
  • Research with understanding of systemic trauma, especially within government services like DWP, where individuals may already feel marginalized or mistreated by previous experiences with bureaucratic systems.

8. Training and Awareness for Researchers

  • Equip researchers with trauma-informed skills: Train staff to recognize and respond to signs of distress, understand trauma responses (fight/flight/freeze), and practice empathy.
  • Ensure researchers understand the potential power dynamics and vulnerabilities of participants, especially in government and welfare research settings like DWP.

These principles combine the ethical sensitivity from general trauma-informed research with the specific needs of vulnerable populations in DWP and digital government services at GDS, providing a solid foundation for conducting responsible, compassionate user research across sectors.

Would you like further insights on methodologies or best practices for applying these principles in real research projects?

 

 

Safety and Trust
 

Create a safe research environment, which gives the participant choice and psychological comfort to share as much of their experiences as they want too at that time. Giving the participant confident control of what they will and will not share.

Build trust with the participant through using gentle and appropriate language. Mimicry works well here, but if needed It is always better to ask what language to use if you are unsure.

Give participants an accurate expectation of the session, if you need to change things up because of what they have shared, and even when changing to a different section of the research or topic, be explicit and ask if they want a pause to prepare. 

Empowerment and Control

Explicitly give participants autonomy and respect it, empowering them to decide which parts of the research they want to engage in and which they do not. Giving choice and agency to how they engage with research, including method of contact, feedback and location of research.

Gain clear consent, ensuring that they understand the goals of the research, how their data will be used and enable them to withdraw at any time without penalty. 

Gain agreement to investigate when they mention a trauma, ask them if they are okay with you asking for further information, reminding them that they do not have to answer anything, do not have to give a reason and they can stop talking about the trauma at any point, without being asked why.

Transparency and Clear Communication

Clearly explain the purpose and process of the research upfront, and how their data will be used, in and accessible format, in translatable English, without idioms and colloquialisms, and/or in their first language. Consider how information may need to be provided in multiple accessible formats if they require support in research.

Maintain communication open and transparent, giving participants a clear accessible method of communication. Keep participants updated throughout the process, ask if they may need additional reminders, adjustments or support to engage in research. Ensure the participant feel informed and respected.

Minimise re-traumatisation

 Be aware, respectful and considerate of past trauma in how you research, be flexible, avoid triggering and distressing your participant.

When determining your research methods, ensure that you do not pressurise your participant to detail or relive their past trauma and experiences.

Provide ethically appropriate emotional support or specific signposting to your participants.

Inclusivity and Accessibility

Ensure research is inclusive and proactively includes participants from diverse backgrounds, including those with disabilities, mental health challenges, or other vulnerabilities.

Ensure that all communication and engagement is accessible and translatable, proactively ask if adjustments would support engagement in communications or research itself. Highlight any pre-existing issues you are aware of, for example if prototype testing if issues are known with compatibility with assistive software.

 

Ethical

6. Ethical Responsibility and Aftercare

  • Take an ethical approach to all stages of the research, ensuring that participants’ rights are respected and that their well-being is prioritized.
  • Offer aftercare, providing resources or referrals to support services if the research process causes distress.
  • Maintain confidentiality and ensure participants’ privacy is respected.

Trauma-Aware Design

Trauma-Aware Design

  • Design services that account for trauma: This includes creating user interfaces that avoid overwhelming or triggering users and ensuring that any required personal information is gathered respectfully and with empathy.
  • Research with understanding of systemic trauma, especially within government services like DWP, where individuals may already feel marginalized or mistreated by previous experiences with bureaucratic systems.

Training and Awareness for Researchers

8. Training and Awareness for Researchers

  • Equip researchers with trauma-informed skills: Train staff to recognize and respond to signs of distress, understand trauma responses (fight/flight/freeze), and practice empathy.
  • Ensure researchers understand the potential power dynamics and vulnerabilities of participants, especially in government and welfare research settings like DWP.

Copyright (c) 2020-2024 Anna Khoury All rights reserved

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.